Ashley St. Clair, a 26-year-old author and influencer, is making shocking claims against Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, accusing him of using his wealth and power to punish her and their child. According to St. Clair, Musk dramatically slashed child support payments for their son, allegedly as retaliation for her refusal to comply with his demands.This revelation has sent ripples through the media and sparked heated debates about the billionaire’s treatment of his former partner and their child.The accusations surfaced after St. Clair revealed she was forced to sell her $100,000 Tesla car just to cover the financial gap left by Musk’s drastic 60 percent reduction in child support. In an interview with The Daily Mail, St. Clair said she had no choice but to part with her prized vehicle, a model S Tesla, to make up for the cut in payments.“I need to make up for the 60 percent cut that Elon made to our son’s child support,” she stated in frustration.For St. Clair, this was more than just a financial setback—it was a personal blow from a man she once trusted. The mother of Musk’s 13th child was visibly upset as she explained her struggle, noting that she did not understand why Musk would take such a drastic action.
She had initially thought that Musk, being one of the wealthiest men in the world, would help provide for their child without hesitation. Instead, she claims he punished her for standing up to him.In a response to St. Clair’s accusations, Musk took to X (formerly known as Twitter) to defend himself. He wrote, “I don’t know if the child is mine or not, but am not against finding out.No court order is needed.” He followed up by stating that despite not knowing for certain, he had already given St. Clair $2.5 million and was sending her an additional $500,000 per year.However, St. Clair wasn’t buying it. She quickly fired back, stating that Musk wasn’t helping her, but simply providing support for his child—support that was supposed to be continuous but was abruptly slashed due to what she saw as his need for control. “We asked you to confirm paternity through a test before our child (who you named) was even born.You refused,” she pointed out. “And you weren’t sending me money, you were sending support for your child that you thought was necessary… until you withdrew most of it to maintain control and punish me for ‘disobedience.’ But you’re really only punishing your son.”
Her response was scathing, accusing Musk of using his social media platform to undermine her and their child. “It’s ironic that your last effort in court was to try to gag me while you use a social media channel you literally own to distribute derogatory messages about me and our child to the entire world,” she stated. “It’s all about control with you, and everyone can see it.” She concluded with a pointed remark: “America needs you to grow up, you petulant man-child.”The back-and-forth between Musk and St. Clair has only intensified the already public feud between the two, with St. Clair’s recent actions highlighting the severe financial strain Musk’s decision has placed on her. After parting with her Tesla, St. Clair made it clear that she felt she had no other option.“I was forced to sell the car,” she said, referring to the lack of support Musk was supposed to be providing.St. Clair’s claims have raised more questions about Musk’s role in the life of his 13th child and his behavior toward his former partner. Despite the overwhelming public interest in his personal life, Musk has largely kept quiet about his relationship with St. Clair.The mother’s allegations paint a picture of a man who, despite his immense wealth, seems to be indifferent to the needs of his child and is willing to punish both the mother and child for perceived disobedience.While Musk has publicly acknowledged the child, he has yet to accept full responsibility as a father. This has led to questions about his commitment to his children, as well as his treatment of women in his life.
Many have pointed to Musk’s wealth and power as a key factor in the dynamics of his relationships. His ability to control his former partners through financial means, such as the drastic cut in child support, highlights a troubling pattern of behavior.The custody dispute between Musk and St. Clair is currently ongoing, but St. Clair’s decision to go public with her accusations has added fuel to the fire. It seems that for Musk, power and control are not limited to his business empire—they extend into his personal relationships as well.As St. Clair pointed out, Musk has used his social media platform, a tool he controls, to disseminate his views while simultaneously attempting to silence her in court.St. Clair’s frustration with Musk’s refusal to acknowledge the paternity of their child or offer any real support has led her to take a stand. While many women in her position might have kept quiet, St. Clair has been vocal about her experience, calling out Musk for what she sees as manipulative and harmful behavior.“It’s not just about money. It’s about control. And you’re really just hurting your child,” she said.
The public’s response to this saga has been divided, with some defending Musk’s actions and others condemning him for his treatment of St. Clair. Some argue that Musk’s withdrawal of financial support could be seen as an attempt to protect his interests and ensure that the child’s upbringing remains in line with his own expectations.Others view his actions as a clear example of financial abuse, a way for Musk to exert power over St. Clair and maintain control over their child’s life.Musk’s treatment of St. Clair has raised questions about the responsibilities of wealthy individuals toward their children and former partners. As one of the richest men in the world, Musk holds significant influence and power, not only in the business world but also in his personal relationships. Yet, despite his wealth, St. Clair’s claims suggest that Musk has used his financial power as a weapon, reducing support for his child as a form of punishment.For St. Clair, this has been a fight for both financial and emotional survival. Her decision to sell her Tesla, a symbol of luxury and status, is an act of desperation. It shows just how far she has been pushed by Musk’s actions.The financial strain she faces is compounded by the emotional toll of dealing with a man who, despite his wealth and status, seems to have little regard for the needs of his own child.
As the battle between Musk and St. Clair continues to play out in the media and in court, one thing is clear: this is not just a dispute over money or custody. It is a fight for power, control, and recognition. Musk’s refusal to fully acknowledge his role as a father and his harsh actions toward St. Clair have cast a shadow over his public persona. And for St. Clair, the fight is far from over.This situation is not just about a reduction in child support payments—it’s about the impact that wealth and power can have on personal relationships. It raises important questions about accountability, control, and the responsibilities of wealthy individuals toward their children and former partners.As this legal battle continues, it is likely that more details will emerge, shedding light on the dynamics of this toxic relationship and the consequences of Musk’s actions.St. Clair’s accusations have only amplified the scrutiny on Musk, and with each new revelation, the public’s perception of the billionaire may continue to shift. Whether Musk will respond to these claims with any further action or remain silent remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: his actions have already sparked a firestorm that won’t easily die down.
